Re: [PATCH 00/11] Various CIL patches

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, Apr 19, 2021 at 12:20 PM Petr Lautrbach <plautrba@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> James Carter <jwcart2@xxxxxxxxx> writes:
>
> > On Thu, Apr 8, 2021 at 3:16 PM James Carter <jwcart2@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >>
> >> All of these patches (except the first) have been sent to the list in the
> >> last month. The first patch is a slight modification of an earlier patch
> >> sent by Nicolas Iooss. I also corrected a couple of whitespace errors and
> >> updated one patch that would not apply cleanly with one of the earlier
> >> patches applied.
> >>
> >> James Carter (11):
> >>   libsepol/cil: Fix out-of-bound read of file context pattern ending
> >>     with "\"
> >>   libsepol/cil: Destroy classperms list when resetting classpermission
> >>   libsepol/cil: Destroy classperm list when resetting map perms
> >>   libsepol/cil: cil_reset_classperms_set() should not reset
> >>     classpermission
> >>   libsepol/cil: Set class field to NULL when resetting struct
> >>     cil_classperms
> >>   libsepol/cil: More strict verification of constraint leaf expressions
> >>   libsepol/cil: Exit with an error if declaration name is a reserved
> >>     word
> >>   libsepol/cil: Allow permission expressions when using map classes
> >>   libsepol/cil: Refactor helper function for cil_gen_node()
> >>   libsepol/cil: Create function cil_add_decl_to_symtab() and refactor
> >>   libsepol/cil: Move check for the shadowing of macro parameters
> >>
> >>  libsepol/cil/src/cil_build_ast.c | 132 ++++++++++++-------------------
> >>  libsepol/cil/src/cil_build_ast.h |   2 +
> >>  libsepol/cil/src/cil_copy_ast.c  |  26 +++---
> >>  libsepol/cil/src/cil_post.c      |  11 +++
> >>  libsepol/cil/src/cil_reset_ast.c |  11 ++-
> >>  libsepol/cil/src/cil_verify.c    |  78 +++++++++++++++++-
> >>  libsepol/cil/src/cil_verify.h    |   3 +-
> >>  7 files changed, 160 insertions(+), 103 deletions(-)
> >>
> >> --
> >> 2.26.3
> >>
> >
> > Most of these patches were sent out almost a month ago. I am planning
> > on merging them next week.
> > Jim
>
> I didn't check the content of the changes, but I ran a regression test
> suite we use in Red Hat on this and "Update checks for invalid rules in
> blocks" patchsets and it didn't discover any problem (just a minor
> trailing whitespace I reported last week)
>
> Acked-by: Petr Lautrbach <plautrba@xxxxxxxxxx>
>
> I believe you can merge it/
>
> Thanks!
>
>
> Petr
>

I have merged both of these.
Thanks,
Jim



[Index of Archives]     [Selinux Refpolicy]     [Linux SGX]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Yosemite Photos]     [Yosemite Camping]     [Yosemite Campsites]     [KDE Users]     [Gnome Users]

  Powered by Linux