On Fri, Feb 12, 2021 at 1:59 PM Ondrej Mosnacek <omosnace@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > Commit 02a52c5c8c3b ("selinux: move policy commit after updating > selinuxfs") moved the selinux_policy_commit() call out of > security_load_policy() into sel_write_load(), which caused a subtle yet > rather serious bug. > > The problem is that security_load_policy() passes a reference to the > convert_params local variable to sidtab_convert(), which stores it in > the sidtab, where it may be accessed until the policy is swapped over > and RCU synchronized. Before 02a52c5c8c3b, selinux_policy_commit() was > called directly from security_load_policy(), so the convert_params > pointer remained valid all the way until the old sidtab was destroyed, > but now that's no longer the case and calls to sidtab_context_to_sid() > on the old sidtab after security_load_policy() returns may cause invalid > memory accesses. > > This can be easily triggered using the stress test from commit > ee1a84fdfeed ("selinux: overhaul sidtab to fix bug and improve > performance"): > ``` > function rand_cat() { > echo $(( $RANDOM % 1024 )) > } > > function do_work() { > while true; do > echo -n "system_u:system_r:kernel_t:s0:c$(rand_cat),c$(rand_cat)" \ > >/sys/fs/selinux/context 2>/dev/null || true > done > } > > do_work >/dev/null & > do_work >/dev/null & > do_work >/dev/null & > > while load_policy; do echo -n .; sleep 0.1; done > > kill %1 > kill %2 > kill %3 > ``` > > Fix this by allocating the temporary sidtab convert structures > dynamically and passing them among the > selinux_policy_{load,cancel,commit} functions. > > Note that this commit also fixes the minor issue of logging a > MAC_POLICY_LOAD audit record in case sel_make_policy_nodes() fails (in > which case the new policy isn't actually loaded). I think you forgot to remove the paragraph above :) Other than that, and a small nit (below), this looks good to me. > Fixes: 02a52c5c8c3b ("selinux: move policy commit after updating selinuxfs") > Signed-off-by: Ondrej Mosnacek <omosnace@xxxxxxxxxx> > --- > security/selinux/include/security.h | 15 ++++++--- > security/selinux/selinuxfs.c | 10 +++--- > security/selinux/ss/services.c | 51 +++++++++++++++++++---------- > 3 files changed, 49 insertions(+), 27 deletions(-) ... > diff --git a/security/selinux/ss/services.c b/security/selinux/ss/services.c > index 5e08ce2c5994..fada4ebc7ef8 100644 > --- a/security/selinux/ss/services.c > +++ b/security/selinux/ss/services.c > @@ -2157,8 +2157,13 @@ static void selinux_policy_cond_free(struct selinux_policy *policy) > kfree(policy); > } > > +struct selinux_policy_convert_data { > + struct convert_context_args args; > + struct sidtab_convert_params sidtab_params; > +}; I generally prefer structs up at the top of the source file, before the forward declarations please. -- paul moore www.paul-moore.com