On Fri, Feb 19, 2021 at 8:49 PM Casey Schaufler <casey@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On 2/19/2021 3:28 PM, Paul Moore wrote: > > As discussed briefly on the list (lore link below), we are a little > > sloppy when it comes to using task credentials, mixing both the > > subjective and object credentials. This patch set attempts to fix > > this by replacing security_task_getsecid() with two new hooks that > > return either the subjective (_subj) or objective (_obj) credentials. > > > > https://lore.kernel.org/linux-security-module/806848326.0ifERbkFSE@x2/T/ > > > > Casey and John, I made a quick pass through the Smack and AppArmor > > code in an effort to try and do the right thing, but I will admit > > that I haven't tested those changes, just the SELinux code. I > > would really appreciate your help in reviewing those changes. If > > you find it easier, feel free to wholesale replace my Smack/AppArmor > > patch with one of your own. > > A quick test pass didn't show up anything obviously > amiss with the Smack changes. I have will do some more > through inspection, but they look fine so far. Thanks for testing it out and giving it a look. Beyond the Smack specific changes, I'm also interested in making sure all the hook callers are correct; I believe I made the correct substitutions, but a second (or third (or fourth ...)) set of eyes is never a bad idea. -- paul moore www.paul-moore.com
