Re: [PATCH] policycoretuils: sestatus belongs to bin not sbin

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 2/16/21 10:31 PM, Nicolas Iooss wrote:
> On Sat, Feb 13, 2021 at 9:44 PM bauen1 <j2468h@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>
>> It is quite useful even to non-privileged users and doesn't require any
>> privileges to work, except for maybe -v.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Jonathan Hettwer <j2468h@xxxxxxxxx>
> 
> I agree with the reasoning, but changing the location of an existing
> tool has the potential to break software which depends on the precise
> location of sestatus (like
> https://github.com/openstack/cookbook-openstack-dashboard/blob/86127240974041b456086b5fff6f8f525c9cf555/spec/spec_helper.rb#L82
> and https://github.com/rapid7/metasploit-framework/blob/4a380771d3a18011af153e47e1d08a4a83feb452/lib/msf/core/post/linux/kernel.rb#L276
> and https://github.com/RedHatInsights/insights-core/blob/6fd58aeab11232a62ea97ba576220abca808c660/insights/specs/default.py#L815
> and ...).

While I personally believe those shouldn't have been hard-coded in the first place, that is a good argument.
Would it be acceptable, if a symlink is added to /usr/sbin/sestatus to link to /usr/bin/sestatus (or the other way) ?

> On the other hand, if you have a clear use-case of non-privileged
> users refusing to add /usr/sbin to their $PATH but willing to use
> sestatus, and that supporting this use-case seems more important than
> not breaking programs which rely on sestatus being in /usr/sbin, this
> patch will be acceptable. Do you know of such a use-case?

My use case is logging in as my normal user account and checking if SELinux is properly working.
I'm not sure _why_ I should have to add sbin to $PATH to access a tool that works properly for non-privileged users, not that I couldn't do that.

IIRC I did once (~2 years ago) have /sbin, /usr/sbin in $PATH, but then I end up with a lot of tools in tab-complete that I can't actually use (properly) and I don't like that.

> (By the way, there is a misspelling in the patch subject: you wrote
> "policycoretuils" instead of "policycoreutils")

Thanks, I'll fix that if necessary.

-- 
bauen1
https://dn42.bauen1.xyz/



[Index of Archives]     [Selinux Refpolicy]     [Linux SGX]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Yosemite Photos]     [Yosemite Camping]     [Yosemite Campsites]     [KDE Users]     [Gnome Users]

  Powered by Linux