[PATCH 1/1] libsepol/cil: unlink blockinherit->block link when destroying a block

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



The following CIL policy triggers a heap use-after-free in secilc
because when the blockinherit node is destroyed, the block node was
already destroyed:

    (block b2a)
    (blockinherit b2a)

Fix this by setting blockinherit->block to NULL when destroying block.

Signed-off-by: Nicolas Iooss <nicolas.iooss@xxxxxxx>
---
 libsepol/cil/src/cil_build_ast.c | 19 ++++++++++++++++++-
 1 file changed, 18 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/libsepol/cil/src/cil_build_ast.c b/libsepol/cil/src/cil_build_ast.c
index 02481558ad11..c6edcde6bc5d 100644
--- a/libsepol/cil/src/cil_build_ast.c
+++ b/libsepol/cil/src/cil_build_ast.c
@@ -231,13 +231,30 @@ exit:
 
 void cil_destroy_block(struct cil_block *block)
 {
+	struct cil_list_item *item;
+	struct cil_tree_node *bi_node;
+	struct cil_blockinherit *inherit;
+
 	if (block == NULL) {
 		return;
 	}
 
 	cil_symtab_datum_destroy(&block->datum);
 	cil_symtab_array_destroy(block->symtab);
-	cil_list_destroy(&block->bi_nodes, CIL_FALSE);
+	if (block->bi_nodes != NULL) {
+		/* unlink blockinherit->block */
+		cil_list_for_each(item, block->bi_nodes) {
+			bi_node = item->data;
+			/* the conditions should always be true, but better be sure */
+			if (bi_node->flavor == CIL_BLOCKINHERIT) {
+				inherit = bi_node->data;
+				if (inherit->block == block) {
+					inherit->block = NULL;
+				}
+			}
+		}
+		cil_list_destroy(&block->bi_nodes, CIL_FALSE);
+	}
 
 	free(block);
 }
-- 
2.30.0




[Index of Archives]     [Selinux Refpolicy]     [Linux SGX]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Yosemite Photos]     [Yosemite Camping]     [Yosemite Campsites]     [KDE Users]     [Gnome Users]

  Powered by Linux