On Tue, Jan 19, 2021 at 3:32 PM Ondrej Mosnacek <omosnace@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On Wed, Jan 6, 2021 at 9:19 AM Nicolas Iooss <nicolas.iooss@xxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > On Sat, Jan 2, 2021 at 11:35 AM Nicolas Iooss <nicolas.iooss@xxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > > > On Thu, Dec 31, 2020 at 3:43 PM William Roberts > > > <bill.c.roberts@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > > > > > On Wed, Dec 30, 2020 at 2:12 PM Nicolas Iooss <nicolas.iooss@xxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > Use the Vagrant configuration in scripts/ci in a workflow for GitHub > > > > > Actions. > > > > > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Nicolas Iooss <nicolas.iooss@xxxxxxx> > > > > > --- > > > > > Example of run: https://github.com/fishilico/selinux/runs/1627586446 > > > > > > > > > > .github/workflows/vm_testsuite.yml | 22 ++++++++++++++++++++++ > > > > > 1 file changed, 22 insertions(+) > > > > > create mode 100644 .github/workflows/vm_testsuite.yml > > > > > > > > > > diff --git a/.github/workflows/vm_testsuite.yml b/.github/workflows/vm_testsuite.yml > > > > > new file mode 100644 > > > > > index 000000000000..af2fad1e73f5 > > > > > --- /dev/null > > > > > +++ b/.github/workflows/vm_testsuite.yml > > > > > @@ -0,0 +1,22 @@ > > > > > +name: Run SELinux testsuite in a virtual machine > > > > > + > > > > > +on: [push, pull_request] > > > > > + > > > > > +jobs: > > > > > + vm_testsuite: > > > > > + > > > > > + # Use VirtualBox+vagrant on macOS, as described in https://github.com/actions/virtual-environments/issues/433 > > > > > + runs-on: macos-latest > > > > > > > > Good find, they support nested virtualization. > > > > > > > > > + > > > > > + steps: > > > > > + - uses: actions/checkout@v2 > > > > > + > > > > > + - name: Create Vagrant VM > > > > > + run: | > > > > > + cd scripts/ci > > > > > + vagrant up > > > > > + > > > > > + - name: Run SELinux testsuite in the VM > > > > > + run: | > > > > > + cd scripts/ci > > > > > + vagrant ssh -- ./run-selinux-test.sh > > > > > -- > > > > > 2.29.2 > > > > > > > > > > > > > LGTM ack. Do you have any fork that has a build with this just to see > > > > it running? > > > > > > Yes, I have been testing it on > > > https://github.com/fishilico/selinux/actions, with several successful > > > builds such as https://github.com/fishilico/selinux/runs/1627586446. > > > > > > Thanks, > > > Nicolas > > > > For information, I have been experiencing some failures due to timeout > > issues while Github Actions creates the Vagrant environment, for > > example in https://github.com/fishilico/selinux/runs/1652713066. I am > > currently trying to run test jobs with "config.vm.boot_timeout = 600" > > (the default value is 300 seconds) in scripts/ci/Vagrantfile and would > > like to wait a little bit before merging this patch, to see whether > > this fixes my issue. I do not want to introduce instability in our CI > > pipeline. > > Hi Nicholas, any update here? I have drafted a similar patch for > selinux-testsuite's own CI, but have been waiting on your findings > regarding the timeouts to avoid needless followups. > > Thanks a lot for finding a way to make this work with GH Actions! Hi, Sorry for the delay. I have been quite busy in the past two weeks, but I am catching up on the latest patches and messages. I am still experiencing occasional boot timeouts (for example in https://github.com/fishilico/selinux/runs/1667663667), despite using "config.vm.boot_timeout = 600" in Vagrantfile. But when this occurs, restarting the GitHub Actions job works. So this is quite annoying but I believe we can live with it (this means that someone will need to click on "Re-run all jobs" on GitHub when this happens). So I merged my patch, and if it becomes too annoying, this workflow can be disabled in the future. Nicolas