On Wed, Nov 11, 2020 at 5:23 PM Ondrej Mosnacek <omosnace@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > ...and refer to selinux(8), which explains it further. > > Signed-off-by: Ondrej Mosnacek <omosnace@xxxxxxxxxx> > --- > policycoreutils/man/man5/selinux_config.5 | 2 +- > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/policycoreutils/man/man5/selinux_config.5 b/policycoreutils/man/man5/selinux_config.5 > index 1ffade15..8d56a559 100644 > --- a/policycoreutils/man/man5/selinux_config.5 > +++ b/policycoreutils/man/man5/selinux_config.5 > @@ -48,7 +48,7 @@ SELinux security policy is enforced. > .IP \fIpermissive\fR 4 > SELinux security policy is not enforced but logs the warnings (i.e. the action is allowed to proceed). > .IP \fIdisabled\fR > -SELinux is disabled and no policy is loaded. > +No SELinux policy is loaded. This option was used to disable SELinux completely, which is now deprected. Use the \fBselinux=0\fR kernel boot option instead (see \fBselinux\fR(8)). Hi, there is a misspelling here: deprected -> deprecated. Otherwise the 3 patches look good to me, thanks! Acked-by: Nicolas Iooss <nicolas.iooss@xxxxxxx> Nicolas
