On Tue, Aug 11, 2020 at 5:05 AM Ondrej Mosnacek <omosnace@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Tue, Aug 11, 2020 at 10:45 AM Ondrej Mosnacek <omosnace@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > The `lib` perl module has been split out of the `perl-interpreter` > > package in Fedora 33 into `perl-lib`. It is needed for the filesystem > > tests. Add it to the dependencies. > > > > Signed-off-by: Ondrej Mosnacek <omosnace@xxxxxxxxxx> > > --- > > README.md | 2 ++ > > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+) > > > > diff --git a/README.md b/README.md > > index ff0a0dc..bfd5b17 100644 > > --- a/README.md > > +++ b/README.md > > @@ -45,6 +45,7 @@ similar dependencies): > > * perl-Test _(test harness used by the testsuite)_ > > * perl-Test-Harness _(test harness used by the testsuite)_ > > * perl-Test-Simple _(for `Test::More`)_ > > +* perl-lib _(for `lib`; split out from `perl-interpreter` since Fedora 33)_ > > * selinux-policy-devel _(to build the test policy)_ > > * gcc _(to build the test programs)_ > > * libselinux-devel _(to build some of the test programs)_ > > @@ -65,6 +66,7 @@ following command: > > # dnf install perl-Test \ > > perl-Test-Harness \ > > perl-Test-Simple \ > > + perl-lib \ > > Note that this package doesn't exist on the earlier versions, so the > command will now work verbatim only on F33+... I'm not sure if we want > to add --skip-broken (might silently skip necessary packages in case > of dependency problems in the repos) or just leave it be. I agree that '--skip-broken' is probably not the best choice for the reasons you already mentioned. I might suggest that if the package is not present in all of the supported versions of Fedora we should add a note to the README.md explaining that. Once the older versions become unsupported the note can be removed. -- paul moore www.paul-moore.com
