On Fri, Jul 31, 2020 at 7:33 PM <bill.c.roberts@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > From: William Roberts <william.c.roberts@xxxxxxxxx> > > License the ci scripts with a permissive, OSI approved license, such as > Apache 2.0. Thanks! On second thought though, I guess any open source license would be fine, since the scripts don't "link" with the rest of the testsuite (which is GPLv2). So if you prefer some more permissive (or shorter... :) license or just public domain, you can probably use that, too. > > Signed-off-by: William Roberts <william.c.roberts@xxxxxxxxx> > --- > scripts/ci/LICENSE | 202 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > scripts/ci/fedora-test-runner.sh | 2 +- > scripts/ci/travis-kvm-setup.sh | 2 +- > 3 files changed, 204 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) > create mode 100644 scripts/ci/LICENSE > <snip> > diff --git a/scripts/ci/fedora-test-runner.sh b/scripts/ci/fedora-test-runner.sh > index 569723387f6b..8d6a572eb094 100755 > --- a/scripts/ci/fedora-test-runner.sh > +++ b/scripts/ci/fedora-test-runner.sh > @@ -1,5 +1,5 @@ > #!/usr/bin/env bash > - > +# SPDX-License-Identifier: Apache-2.0 I think you should also add a copyright line alongside the SPDX header. See: https://matija.suklje.name/how-and-why-to-properly-write-copyright-statements-in-your-code#why-have-the-copyright-statement > set -ev > > # > diff --git a/scripts/ci/travis-kvm-setup.sh b/scripts/ci/travis-kvm-setup.sh > index 8d4cfb79f7d7..275d05299971 100755 > --- a/scripts/ci/travis-kvm-setup.sh > +++ b/scripts/ci/travis-kvm-setup.sh > @@ -1,5 +1,5 @@ > #!/usr/bin/env bash > - > +# SPDX-License-Identifier: Apache-2.0 Ditto. > set -ev > > TEST_RUNNER="scripts/ci/fedora-test-runner.sh" > -- > 2.17.1 > -- Ondrej Mosnacek Software Engineer, Platform Security - SELinux kernel Red Hat, Inc.
