On Mon, Jun 22, 2020 at 8:22 AM Stephen Smalley <stephen.smalley.work@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On Mon, Jun 8, 2020 at 12:18 PM Stephen Smalley > <stephen.smalley.work@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > On Fri, Jun 5, 2020 at 4:24 AM Topi Miettinen <toiwoton@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > > > At least on Debian, /etc/protocols, which is used by > > > socket.getprotobyname() to resolve protocols to names, does not > > > contain an entry for "ipv4". In that case, set the protocol number > > > used by audit logs for "ipv4" to a fixed value. To ensure audit log > > > compatibility, let's use the same numeric value as Fedora: 4, which is > > > actually understood by kernel as IP over IP. > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Topi Miettinen <toiwoton@xxxxxxxxx> > > > > This looks fine to me but adding linux-audit mailing list to see if > > they have any concerns. It appears to make no change to the audit > > messages on Fedora. > > Seeing no objections from linux-audit, > > Acked-by: Stephen Smalley <stephen.smalley.work@xxxxxxxxx> Applied.
