Re: [PATCH 0/9] SELinux: Improve hash functions and sizing of hash tables

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



The 04/14/2020 17:50, Paul Moore wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 13, 2020 at 4:43 PM Siarhei Liakh
> <siarhei.liakh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > Looks like I sent you a snapshot with a couple of minor porting errors before I
> > fixed them. You can still look at the patches since the errors do not change
> > the logic, just hold off on compiling. Apologies for the mix-up, I'll send out
> > another version soon.
> 
> ...
> 
> > I've got a Fedora 32 beta box installed, so I will get some benchmark numbers
> > for Linus' tree with default F32 policies soon.
> 
> Okay, once you've got some updated numbers and a revised patchset we
> can revisit this.

I've posted a revised patch set here:
https://lore.kernel.org/selinux/20200429202941.18320-1-siarhei.liakh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx/

Please let me knwo what you think.
Thank you!

-- 
Siarhei Liakh
Concurrent Real-Time



[Index of Archives]     [Selinux Refpolicy]     [Linux SGX]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Yosemite Photos]     [Yosemite Camping]     [Yosemite Campsites]     [KDE Users]     [Gnome Users]

  Powered by Linux