Em Wed, Apr 22, 2020 at 05:44:02PM +0300, Alexey Budankov escreveu:
>
> Update error message to mention CAP_PERFMON only. CAP_SYS_ADMIN still
> works in keeping with user space backward compatibility approach.
This will confuse users that build the latest perf to use in older
systems where CAP_PERFMON isn't available, probably we need to, in these
cases, check for the existence of CAP_PERFMON to provide a better
warning message, something like:
You need CAP_ADMIN or update your kernel and libcap to one that supports
CAP_PERFMON.
For systems without CAP_PERFMON, while mentioning only CAP_PERFMON for
systems where it is present, right?
> Signed-off-by: Alexey Budankov <alexey.budankov@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> tools/perf/builtin-ftrace.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/tools/perf/builtin-ftrace.c b/tools/perf/builtin-ftrace.c
> index 55eda54240fb..39d43ad02f30 100644
> --- a/tools/perf/builtin-ftrace.c
> +++ b/tools/perf/builtin-ftrace.c
> @@ -288,7 +288,7 @@ static int __cmd_ftrace(struct perf_ftrace *ftrace, int argc, const char **argv)
> perf_cap__capable(CAP_SYS_ADMIN))) {
> pr_err("ftrace only works for %s!\n",
> #ifdef HAVE_LIBCAP_SUPPORT
> - "users with the CAP_PERFMON or CAP_SYS_ADMIN capability"
> + "users with the CAP_PERFMON capability"
> #else
> "root"
> #endif
> --
> 2.24.1
>
--
- Arnaldo
