Re: [PATCH] libsepol: Use ebitmap_length() to check for an empty ebitmap

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, Feb 18, 2020 at 9:45 PM James Carter <jwcart2@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> When checking whether or not an ebitmap has any bits set, use
> ebitmap_length() instead of ebitmap_cardinality().
>
> There is no need to find out how many bits are set, if all that is
> needed is to determine if any bits are set at all.
>
> Signed-off-by: James Carter <jwcart2@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
>  libsepol/src/kernel_to_cil.c  | 10 +++++-----
>  libsepol/src/kernel_to_conf.c |  8 ++++----
>  libsepol/src/module_to_cil.c  | 16 ++++++++--------
>  3 files changed, 17 insertions(+), 17 deletions(-)

Thanks, this looks good! Although I'm thinking if we shouldn't add a
specific function for this, e.g.:

static inline bool ebitmap_is_empty(ebitmap_t *e)
{
        return ebitmap_length(e) == 0;
}

...because ebitmap_length() is kind of an implementation detail and it
is easy to confuse ebitmap_length() and ebitmap_cardinality(). Note
there are already some existing callers of ebitmap_length() that would
also need converting to ebitmap_is_empty() in that case.

<diff snipped>

-- 
Ondrej Mosnacek <omosnace at redhat dot com>
Software Engineer, Security Technologies
Red Hat, Inc.




[Index of Archives]     [Selinux Refpolicy]     [Linux SGX]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Yosemite Photos]     [Yosemite Camping]     [Yosemite Campsites]     [KDE Users]     [Gnome Users]

  Powered by Linux