On 1/28/20 2:45 PM, jwcart2 wrote:
On 1/28/20 12:26 PM, Stephen Smalley wrote:
Remove restrictions in libsepol and checkpolicy that required all
declared initial SIDs to be assigned a context. With this patch,
it is possible to build and load a policy that drops the sid <sidname>
<context> declarations for the unused initial SIDs. It is still
required to retain the sid <sidname> declarations (in the flask
definitions) in order to preserve the initial SID ordering/values.
The unused initial SIDs can be renamed, e.g. to add an unused_
prefix or similar, if desired, since the names used in the policy
are not stored in the kernel binary policy.
In CIL policies, the (sid ...) and (sidorder (...)) statements
must be left intact for compatibility but the (sidcontext ...)
statements for the unused initial SIDs can be omitted after this change.
With current kernels, if one removes an unused initial SID context
from policy, builds policy with this change applied and loads the
policy into the kernel, cat /sys/fs/selinux/initial_contexts/<sidname>
will show the unlabeled context. With the kernel patch to remove unused
initial SIDs, the /sys/fs/selinux/initial_contexts/<sidname>
file will not be created for unused initial SIDs in the first place.
NB If an unused initial SID was assigned a context different from
the unlabeled context in existing policy, then it is not safe to
remove that initial SID context from policy and reload policy on
the running kernel that was booted with the original policy. This
is because that kernel may have assigned that SID to various kernel
objects already and those objects will then be treated as having
the unlabeled context after the removal. In refpolicy, examples
of such initial SIDs are the "fs" SID and the "sysctl" SID. Even
though these initial SIDs are not directly used (in code) by the current
kernel, their contexts are being applied to filesystems and sysctl
files by
policy and therefore the SIDs are being assigned to objects.
NB The "sysctl" SID was in use by the kernel up until
commit 8e6c96935fcc1ed3dbebc96fddfef3f2f2395afc ("security/selinux:
fix /proc/sys/ labeling) circa v2.6.39. Removing its context from
policy will break kernels < 2.6.39.
Signed-off-by: Stephen Smalley <sds@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
[...]
I see that you don't do anything with ocontext_read_xen(), so Xen
policies still require initial sid contexts? If so, doesn't that mean
that CIL behavior needs to depend on whether or not a Xen policy is
being created?
On second thought, I don't think I need to change
ocontext_read_selinux() or the kernel to accept/ignore these entries. I
just need to make sure that they are not included in the generated
policy file in the first place. It was already possible that the
OCON_ISID list might not include every initial SID. So I don't think it
will need to be target-specific.
