Re: question about fs sid

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 1/27/20 7:52 AM, Dominick Grift wrote:
What is the fs sid used for exactly? What, if any, is its relationship with persistent file systems with xattr support.
Were currently associating a type that is generally also associated with persistent filesystems that support xattr but i dont know why.
Why would it not apply to other filesystems, for example tmpfs or vfat or whatever?

Is the fs sid still used and what do i need to consider when determining what context to associate with it?

Are you referring to the fs initial SID, or to the SID associated with each filesystem/superblock?

The former appears to be unused by any kernel code other than the declaration (grep -r SECINITSID_FS). At one time, it was the default SID to use for the filesystem/superblock. Looks like this has never been used in mainline Linux, just pre-mainline SELinux. Sadly we cannot just remove obsolete initial SIDs until we fix https://github.com/SELinuxProject/selinux-kernel/issues/12

The latter is still relevant but the defaults are now determined through fs_use_* or genfscon statements, default to the unlabeled SID if there is no match, and can be overridden via the fscontext= mount option. It is used in permission checks on the superblock/filesystem (e.g. mount, unmount, ...) and to limit what file contexts can be assigned to files within the filesystem (associate).



[Index of Archives]     [Selinux Refpolicy]     [Linux SGX]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Yosemite Photos]     [Yosemite Camping]     [Yosemite Campsites]     [KDE Users]     [Gnome Users]

  Powered by Linux