Am Fr., 24. Jan. 2020 um 19:53 Uhr schrieb Stephen Smalley <sds@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>:
>
> On 1/24/20 1:42 PM, Christian Göttsche wrote:
> > Currently symlinks on kernel filesystems, like sysfs, are labeled on
> > creation with the parent fs root sid.
> >
> > Allow symlinks to inherit the parent directory context, so fine-grained
> > kernfs labeling can be applied to symlinks too and checking contexts
> > doesn't complain about them.
> >
> > For backward-compatibility this behavior is contained in a new policy
> > capability: kernfs_sovereign_symlinks
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Christian Göttsche <cgzones@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > ---
> > security/selinux/hooks.c | 5 ++++-
> > security/selinux/include/security.h | 8 ++++++++
> > security/selinux/ss/services.c | 3 ++-
> > 3 files changed, 14 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/security/selinux/hooks.c b/security/selinux/hooks.c
> > index d9e8b2131..1303bc8c4 100644
> > --- a/security/selinux/hooks.c
> > +++ b/security/selinux/hooks.c
> > @@ -1475,7 +1475,10 @@ static int inode_doinit_with_dentry(struct inode *inode, struct dentry *opt_dent
> > /* Default to the fs superblock SID. */
> > sid = sbsec->sid;
> >
> > - if ((sbsec->flags & SE_SBGENFS) && !S_ISLNK(inode->i_mode)) {
> > + if (((sbsec->flags & SE_SBGENFS) &&
> > + (!S_ISLNK(inode->i_mode))) ||
> > + (selinux_policycap_kernfs_sovereign_symlinks() &&
>
> Not fond of the name. 1) kernfs is a kernel implementation detail,
> shouldn't be exposed to policy; genfs is the policy construct 2)
> sovereign doesn't seem to fit the meaning of this capability; seclabel
> would be more appropriate.
Something like genfs_seclabel_symlinks?
> > + (sbsec->flags & SE_SBGENFS_XATTR))) {
>
> Why limit this to SE_SBGENFS_XATTR filesystems? Why not just make the test:
> if ((sbsec->flags & SE_SBGENFS) && (!S_ISLNK(inode->i_mode) ||
> selinux_policycap_genfs_symlinkseclabel()))
> or similar.
I somehow thought that this functionality is limited to filesystems
with SE_SBGENFS_XATTR;
so I can expand the check to SE_SBGENFS.
> > /* We must have a dentry to determine the label on
> > * procfs inodes */
> > if (opt_dentry) {
> > diff --git a/security/selinux/include/security.h b/security/selinux/include/security.h
> > index a39f9565d..cc8217848 100644
> > --- a/security/selinux/include/security.h
> > +++ b/security/selinux/include/security.h
> > @@ -79,6 +79,7 @@ enum {
> > POLICYDB_CAPABILITY_ALWAYSNETWORK,
> > POLICYDB_CAPABILITY_CGROUPSECLABEL,
> > POLICYDB_CAPABILITY_NNP_NOSUID_TRANSITION,
> > + POLICYDB_CAPABILITY_KERNFS_SOVEREIGN_SYMLINKS,
> > __POLICYDB_CAPABILITY_MAX
> > };
> > #define POLICYDB_CAPABILITY_MAX (__POLICYDB_CAPABILITY_MAX - 1)
> > @@ -209,6 +210,13 @@ static inline bool selinux_policycap_nnp_nosuid_transition(void)
> > return state->policycap[POLICYDB_CAPABILITY_NNP_NOSUID_TRANSITION];
> > }
> >
> > +static inline bool selinux_policycap_kernfs_sovereign_symlinks(void)
> > +{
> > + struct selinux_state *state = &selinux_state;
> > +
> > + return state->policycap[POLICYDB_CAPABILITY_KERNFS_SOVEREIGN_SYMLINKS];
> > +}
> > +
> > int security_mls_enabled(struct selinux_state *state);
> > int security_load_policy(struct selinux_state *state,
> > void *data, size_t len);
> > diff --git a/security/selinux/ss/services.c b/security/selinux/ss/services.c
> > index 216ce602a..b70380947 100644
> > --- a/security/selinux/ss/services.c
> > +++ b/security/selinux/ss/services.c
> > @@ -73,7 +73,8 @@ const char *selinux_policycap_names[__POLICYDB_CAPABILITY_MAX] = {
> > "extended_socket_class",
> > "always_check_network",
> > "cgroup_seclabel",
> > - "nnp_nosuid_transition"
> > + "nnp_nosuid_transition",
> > + "kernfs_sovereign_symlinks"
> > };
> >
> > static struct selinux_ss selinux_ss;
> >
>
