Re: [PATCH v2] selinux: fix regression introduced by move_mount(2) syscall

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, Jan 20, 2020 at 10:43 AM Stephen Smalley
<stephen.smalley@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> On Mon, Jan 20, 2020 at 10:40 AM Stephen Smalley
> <stephen.smalley@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >
> > On Mon, Jan 20, 2020 at 7:52 AM Paul Moore <paul@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > > It also looks like the fs tests Richard is working on includes tests
> > > for the move_mount() so I think we are covered as far as the
> > > selinux-testsuite is concerned.
> >
> > Not sure since those tests were just added in the latest version of
> > his patches and at this point he would
> > be running on kernels that lack this permission check.
>
> Ah, never mind - I see that he mentioned that he applied my move_mount
> patch before performing those tests.
> That means that there should be a test failure on kernels >= 5.2 (i.e.
> that have move_mount(2)) that lack this
> patch IIUC.

Never mind again; he has the move_mount test under a conditional that
will get updated to be specific to a kernel version if/when my patch
lands.



[Index of Archives]     [Selinux Refpolicy]     [Linux SGX]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Yosemite Photos]     [Yosemite Camping]     [Yosemite Campsites]     [KDE Users]     [Gnome Users]

  Powered by Linux