On Thu, Dec 5, 2019 at 9:08 AM Paul Moore <paul@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Thanks for the double check. Unfortunately my kernel build locks my > test VM in early boot; it appears to be non-SELinux related and since > the test build is based on selinux/next+patches (which is based off > v5.4-rc1) I imagine there might be some unrelated problems in the > build. I'm going to rebase my test build to Linus' current and try > this again. Hmm. I haven't done any debugging yet, but the BPF tests are failing (they pass with kernel-5.5.0-0.rc0.git5.1.2.secnext.fc32.x86_64): 1..15 ok 1 Failed to load BPF prog: Invalid argument not ok 2 # Failed test at ./test line 68. Failed to create BPF map: Permission denied ok 3 Failed to create BPF map: Permission denied ok 4 Failed to create BPF map: Permission denied ok 5 Failed to load BPF prog: Permission denied ok 6 Failed to load BPF prog: Invalid argument ok 7 client: Using a BPF map fd client: Connected to server via ./test_sock server: Accepted a connection, receiving message client: Sent descriptor, waiting for reply server: Received a descriptor, fd=5, sending back 0 client: Received reply, code=0 client: ...This implies the descriptor was received ok 8 Failed to load BPF prog: Invalid argument client: Using a BPF prog fd client: Connected to server via ./test_sock sendmsg: Bad file descriptor server: Accepted a connection, receiving message server: Received no descriptor, sending back 1 not ok 9 # Failed test at ./test line 118. Failed to load BPF prog: Invalid argument client: Using a BPF prog fd connect: Connection refused ok 10 client: Using a BPF map fd connect: Connection refused ok 11 ok 12 Client request_service_provider_fd() failing command BR_FAILED_REPLY, exiting. ok 13 ok 14 Failed to load BPF prog: Invalid argument Client request_service_provider_fd() failing command BR_FAILED_REPLY, exiting. ok 15 # Looks like you failed 2 tests of 15. -- paul moore www.paul-moore.com
