On Fri, Oct 18, 2019 at 11:01 AM Chris PeBenito <pebenito@xxxxxxxx> wrote: > On 10/18/19 5:00 AM, Chris PeBenito wrote: > > On 10/18/19 3:44 AM, Ondrej Mosnacek wrote: > >> Since there are plans to support > >> only Python 3 in 3.0+ this may not be an issue, but I could also add a > >> few lines to fallback to sequential execution under Python 2 for the > >> sake of compatibility. Would that be OK or should I not bother? > > > > Python 2 end of life is in less than 2 months. Please don't add new > > code only for Python 2 compatibility. > > I can't count. It's a little over 2 months. The point still stands :) OK, I posted a v2 without the fallback. -- Ondrej Mosnacek <omosnace at redhat dot com> Software Engineer, Security Technologies Red Hat, Inc.
