Re: [PATCH v2] selinux: avoid atomic_t usage in sidtab

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, Aug 14, 2019 at 9:33 AM Ondrej Mosnacek <omosnace@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> As noted in Documentation/atomic_t.txt, if we don't need the RMW atomic
> operations, we should only use READ_ONCE()/WRITE_ONCE() +
> smp_rmb()/smp_wmb() where necessary (or the combined variants
> smp_load_acquire()/smp_store_release()).
>
> This patch converts the sidtab code to use regular u32 for the counter
> and reverse lookup cache and use the appropriate operations instead of
> atomic_get()/atomic_set(). Note that when reading/updating the reverse
> lookup cache we don't need memory barriers as it doesn't need to be
> consistent or accurate. We can now also replace some atomic ops with
> regular loads (when under spinlock) and stores (for conversion target
> fields that are always accessed under the master table's spinlock).
>
> We can now also bump SIDTAB_MAX to U32_MAX as we can use the full u32
> range again.
>
> Suggested-by: Jann Horn <jannh@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Signed-off-by: Ondrej Mosnacek <omosnace@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Reviewed-by: Jann Horn <jannh@xxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
>
> v2: Added comments detailing access semantics of sidtab fields.
>
>  security/selinux/ss/sidtab.c | 48 ++++++++++++++++--------------------
>  security/selinux/ss/sidtab.h | 19 ++++++++++----
>  2 files changed, 35 insertions(+), 32 deletions(-)

Sorry for the delay on this, it was a casualty of LSS-NA.  Regardless,
this looks better, I just merged it into selinux/next - thanks!

-- 
paul moore
www.paul-moore.com



[Index of Archives]     [Selinux Refpolicy]     [Linux SGX]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Yosemite Photos]     [Yosemite Camping]     [Yosemite Campsites]     [KDE Users]     [Gnome Users]

  Powered by Linux