Paul Moore <paul@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Hello netdev, > > I was just made aware of the skb extension work, and it looks very > appealing from a LSM perspective. As some of you probably remember, > we (the LSM folks) have wanted a proper security blob in the skb for > quite some time, but netdev has been resistant to this idea thus far. Is that "blob" in addition to skb->secmark, or a replacement?
