RE: [RFC PATCH v4 10/12] security/selinux: Add enclave_load() implementation

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



> From: Christopherson, Sean J
> Sent: Wednesday, June 19, 2019 3:24 PM
> 
> Intended use of each permission:
> 
>   - SGX_EXECDIRTY: dynamically load code within the enclave itself
>   - SGX_EXECUNMR: load unmeasured code into the enclave, e.g. Graphene

Why does it matter whether a code page is measured or not?

>   - SGX_EXECANON: load code from anonymous memory (likely Graphene)

Graphene doesn't load code from anonymous memory. It loads code dynamically though, as in SGX_EXECDIRTY case.

>   - SGX_EXECUTE: load an enclave from a file, i.e. normal behavior

Why is SGX_EXECUTE needed from security perspective? Or why isn't FILE__EXECUTE sufficient?



[Index of Archives]     [Selinux Refpolicy]     [Linux SGX]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Yosemite Photos]     [Yosemite Camping]     [Yosemite Campsites]     [KDE Users]     [Gnome Users]

  Powered by Linux