On Tue, 4 Jun 2019, Casey Schaufler wrote: > > It isn't free so there should be a cost/benefit analysis. > > Some benchmarking is definitely in order, but most > of what's you're calling out as downside is hypothetical > or based on assumption. When you're proposing changes such as these, which make fundamental and far-reaching changes, the burden is on you to present the cost/benefit analysis. You can't just say "Here are some changes and here are the benefits, and any possible costs are merely hypothetical". -- James Morris <jmorris@xxxxxxxxx>
