On 6/3/19 1:37 PM, Sean Christopherson wrote: > Heh, fair enough. IIRC, a while back someone posted about having problems > building a 512gb enclave in a 92mb EPC... > > How about this for the intermediate patch: > > struct sgx_enclave_add_region { > __u64 addr; > __u64 src; > __u64 size; > __u64 secinfo; > __u16 mrmask; > __u16 reserved16; > __u32 reserved; > } Looks fine to me.