On 4/18/19 1:49 PM, jwcart2 wrote:
On 4/18/19 11:18 AM, William Roberts wrote:
On Thu, Apr 18, 2019 at 6:27 AM jwcart2 <jwcart2@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On 4/17/19 12:37 PM, Gary Tierney wrote:
These changes come from a report by a user on the Freenode IRC channel that
they were unable to build policies for a machine that has an older version of
libsepol installed.
A new `-c` option that mirrors checkpolicy's own has been added to checkmodule,
and the output of a simple test is shown below:
$ cat > test.te <<EOF
module test 1.0;
require {
type domain;
type file_type;
class file { read write };
}
allow domain file_type : file { read write };
EOF
$ obj/usr/bin/checkmodule -m -M -c 10 -o test.mod test.te
$ checkpolicy/test/dismod test.mod
Reading policy...
... snip ...
Binary policy module file loaded.
Module name: test
Module version: 1.0
Policy version: 10
Worthy of note, however, is that these policy version numbers differ from those
used by the kernel policy format.
Gary Tierney (2):
checkmodule: add support for specifying module policy version
dismod: print policy version of loaded modules
checkpolicy/checkmodule.8 | 5 ++++-
checkpolicy/checkmodule.c | 29 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++--
checkpolicy/test/dismod.c | 4 ++--
3 files changed, 33 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
Acked-by: James Carter <jwcart2@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
James there's a superfluous newline between strtol() and errno.
Thanks, I missed that.
I don't see the need for another version of the patches. I can fix that minor
issue when I merge the patches tomorrow.
Merged with the extra newline removed.
--
James Carter <jwcart2@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
National Security Agency
--
James Carter <jwcart2@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
National Security Agency
