Re: [PATCH] selinux: use kernel linux/socket.h definitions for PF_MAX

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, Feb 27, 2019 at 12:46 PM Paulo Alcantara <paulo@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Paul Moore <paul@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:
>
> > On Wed, Feb 27, 2019 at 12:07 PM Paulo Alcantara <paulo@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >> Paulo Alcantara <paulo@xxxxxxxx> writes:
> >> > When compiling genheaders and mdp from a newer host kernel, the
> >> > following error happens:
> >> >
> >> >     In file included from scripts/selinux/genheaders/genheaders.c:18:
> >> >     ./security/selinux/include/classmap.h:238:2: error: #error New
> >> >     address family defined, please update secclass_map.  #error New
> >> >     address family defined, please update secclass_map.  ^~~~~
> >> >     make[3]: *** [scripts/Makefile.host:107:
> >> >     scripts/selinux/genheaders/genheaders] Error 1 make[2]: ***
> >> >     [scripts/Makefile.build:599: scripts/selinux/genheaders] Error 2
> >> >     make[1]: *** [scripts/Makefile.build:599: scripts/selinux] Error 2
> >> >     make[1]: *** Waiting for unfinished jobs....
> >> >
> >> > Instead of relying on the host definition, include linux/socket.h in
> >> > classmap.h to have PF_MAX.
> >> >
> >> > Signed-off-by: Paulo Alcantara <paulo@xxxxxxxx>
> >> > ---
> >> >  scripts/selinux/genheaders/genheaders.c | 1 -
> >> >  scripts/selinux/mdp/mdp.c               | 1 -
> >> >  security/selinux/include/classmap.h     | 1 +
> >> >  3 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)
> >>
> >> Ping?
> >>
> >> Could someone please take a look at this issue?
> >
> > It looks fine to me, but I typically don't merge patches this late in
> > the development window (we are at -rc8), unless it is a serious bug
> > fix.
>
> Fair enough.
>
> >> It's quite easy to reproduce on my host (4.20+) when building an
> >> unpatched 4.14 kernel ...
> >
> > While this is a good patch that does fix a real but, the fact that it
> > has been broken for several releases tells me this is not a serious
> > bug and not likely worth the risk for the upcoming merge window
> > (however small it may be).  There has been a lot of good work put into
> > mdp very recently, and I expect to merge that, as well as your fix,
> > once the upcoming merge window closes.
>
> Looks good to me. Thanks!

Merged into selinux/next, thanks for the patch and your patience.

-- 
paul moore
www.paul-moore.com



[Index of Archives]     [Selinux Refpolicy]     [Linux SGX]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Yosemite Photos]     [Yosemite Camping]     [Yosemite Campsites]     [KDE Users]     [Gnome Users]

  Powered by Linux