Re: [PATCH v2] LSM: Ignore "security=" when "lsm=" is specified

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Sun, Feb 17, 2019 at 12:17 AM Tetsuo Handa
<penguin-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On 2019/02/14 1:05, Casey Schaufler wrote:
> > On 2/12/2019 10:23 AM, Kees Cook wrote:
> >> To avoid potential confusion, explicitly ignore "security=" when "lsm=" is
> >> used on the command line, and report that it is happening.
> >>
> >> Suggested-by: Tetsuo Handa <penguin-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> >> Signed-off-by: Kees Cook <keescook@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> >
> > Acked-by: Casey Schaufler <casey@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>
> The manual for TOMOYO was updated to follow this change.
> SELinux folks and AppArmor folks, can we apply this change?

My main concern is that "selinux={0|1}" continues to work as it has
for years.  It doesn't look like this affects that, but I can't say
I've dug into these changes very far.

-- 
paul moore
www.paul-moore.com



[Index of Archives]     [Selinux Refpolicy]     [Linux SGX]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Yosemite Photos]     [Yosemite Camping]     [Yosemite Campsites]     [KDE Users]     [Gnome Users]

  Powered by Linux