Re: [PATCH] python/semanage: Include MCS/MLS range when exporting local customizations

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, Dec 4, 2018 at 5:39 PM Vit Mojzis <vmojzis@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> Signed-off-by: Vit Mojzis <vmojzis@xxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
>  python/semanage/seobject.py | 16 ++++++++--------
>  1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/python/semanage/seobject.py b/python/semanage/seobject.py
> index c4c65621..b8c43efe 100644
> --- a/python/semanage/seobject.py
> +++ b/python/semanage/seobject.py
> @@ -1293,9 +1293,9 @@ class portRecords(semanageRecords):
>          ddict = self.get_all(True)
>          for k in sorted(ddict.keys()):
>              if k[0] == k[1]:
> -                l.append("-a -t %s -p %s %s" % (ddict[k][0], k[2], k[0]))
> +                l.append("-a -t %s -r '%s' -p %s %s" % (ddict[k][0], ddict[k][1], k[2], k[0]))
>              else:
> -                l.append("-a -t %s -p %s %s-%s" % (ddict[k][0], k[2], k[0], k[1]))
> +                l.append("-a -t %s -r '%s' -p %s %s-%s" % (ddict[k][0], ddict[k][1], k[2], k[0], k[1]))
>          return l
>
>      def list(self, heading=1, locallist=0):
> @@ -1550,9 +1550,9 @@ class ibpkeyRecords(semanageRecords):
>
>          for k in sorted(ddict.keys()):
>              if k[0] == k[1]:
> -                l.append("-a -t %s -x %s %s" % (ddict[k][0], k[2], k[0]))
> +                l.append("-a -t %s -r '%s' -x %s %s" % (ddict[k][0], ddict[k][1], k[2], k[0]))
>              else:
> -                l.append("-a -t %s -x %s %s-%s" % (ddict[k][0], k[2], k[0], k[1]))
> +                l.append("-a -t %s -r '%s' -x %s %s-%s" % (ddict[k][0], ddict[k][1], k[2], k[0], k[1]))
>          return l
>
>      def list(self, heading=1, locallist=0):
> @@ -1793,7 +1793,7 @@ class ibendportRecords(semanageRecords):
>          ddict = self.get_all(True)
>
>          for k in sorted(ddict.keys()):
> -            l.append("-a -t %s -r %s -z %s %s" % (ddict[k][0], ddict[k][1], k[1], k[0]))
> +            l.append("-a -t %s -r '%s' -z %s %s" % (ddict[k][0], ddict[k][1], k[1], k[0]))
>          return l
>
>      def list(self, heading=1, locallist=0):
> @@ -2033,7 +2033,7 @@ class nodeRecords(semanageRecords):
>          l = []
>          ddict = self.get_all(True)
>          for k in sorted(ddict.keys()):
> -            l.append("-a -M %s -p %s -t %s %s" % (k[1], k[2], ddict[k][2], k[0]))
> +            l.append("-a -M %s -p %s -t %s -r '%s' %s" % (k[1], k[2], ddict[k][2], ddict[k][3], k[0]))
>          return l
>
>      def list(self, heading=1, locallist=0):
> @@ -2227,7 +2227,7 @@ class interfaceRecords(semanageRecords):
>          l = []
>          ddict = self.get_all(True)
>          for k in sorted(ddict.keys()):
> -            l.append("-a -t %s %s" % (ddict[k][2], k))
> +            l.append("-a -t %s -r '%s' %s" % (ddict[k][2], ddict[k][3], k))
>          return l
>
>      def list(self, heading=1, locallist=0):
> @@ -2609,7 +2609,7 @@ class fcontextRecords(semanageRecords):
>          fcon_dict = self.get_all(True)
>          for k in sorted(fcon_dict.keys()):
>              if fcon_dict[k]:
> -                l.append("-a -f %s -t %s '%s'" % (file_type_str_to_option[k[1]], fcon_dict[k][2], k[0]))
> +                l.append("-a -f %s -t %s -r '%s' '%s'" % (file_type_str_to_option[k[1]], fcon_dict[k][2], fcon_dict[k][3], k[0]))
>
>          if len(self.equiv):
>              for target in self.equiv.keys():
> --
> 2.17.2
>

When testing this on a system without MLS, it displayed "None", which
is quite ugly. As this behavior already exists in the code, I merged
your patch and will send one to produce a clean output on systems
without MLS.
Thanks!
Nicolas




[Index of Archives]     [Selinux Refpolicy]     [Linux SGX]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Yosemite Photos]     [Yosemite Camping]     [Yosemite Campsites]     [KDE Users]     [Gnome Users]

  Powered by Linux