Re: [PATCH v4 14/19] LSM: Infrastructure management of the inode security

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, 21 Sep 2018, Kees Cook wrote:

> On Fri, Sep 21, 2018 at 5:19 PM, Casey Schaufler <casey@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> > + * lsm_early_inode - during initialization allocate a composite inode blob
> > + * @inode: the inode that needs a blob
> > + *
> > + * Allocate the inode blob for all the modules if it's not already there
> > + */
> > +void lsm_early_inode(struct inode *inode)
> > +{
> > +       int rc;
> > +
> > +       if (inode == NULL)
> > +               panic("%s: NULL inode.\n", __func__);
> > +       if (inode->i_security != NULL)
> > +               return;
> > +       rc = lsm_inode_alloc(inode);
> > +       if (rc)
> > +               panic("%s: Early inode alloc failed.\n", __func__);
> > +}
> 
> I'm still advising against using panic(), but I'll leave it up to James.
> 

Calling panic() is not appropriate here. Perhaps if it was during 
boot-time initialization of LSM infrastructure, but not on the fly.

Use a WARN_ONCE then propagate the error back and fail the operation.


-- 
James Morris
<jmorris@xxxxxxxxx>

_______________________________________________
Selinux mailing list
Selinux@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe, send email to Selinux-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxx.
To get help, send an email containing "help" to Selinux-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx.



[Index of Archives]     [Selinux Refpolicy]     [Linux SGX]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Yosemite Photos]     [Yosemite Camping]     [Yosemite Campsites]     [KDE Users]     [Gnome Users]

  Powered by Linux