On 06/12/2018 02:12 PM, Paul Moore wrote: > On Tue, Jun 12, 2018 at 4:32 PM, James Morris <jmorris@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> On Mon, 11 Jun 2018, Casey Schaufler wrote: >> >>> If you want to break this up by security module I would take >>> the Smack part as soon as James does the tree update. If James >>> wants to take the whole thing at once you can add my: >>> >>> Acked-by: Casey Schaufler <casey@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> >>> >>> for the Smack changes. >> >> It's probably simplest for me to take them as one patch. > > I would prefer if the SELinux changes were split into a separate > patch. I'm guessing John would probably want the same for the > AppArmor patches, but take his work for it, not mine. yes that would be preferred > > Joe, in general I really appreciate the fixes you send, but these > patches that cross a lot of subsystem boundaries (this isn't the first > one that does this) causes unnecessary conflicts in -next and during > the merge window. Could you split your patches up from now on please? > yeah splitting patches at subsystem boundaries is highly recommended. _______________________________________________ Selinux mailing list Selinux@xxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe, send email to Selinux-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxx. To get help, send an email containing "help" to Selinux-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx.
