On 2018-04-16 09:26, Ondrej Mosnacek wrote: > 2018-04-10 1:34 GMT+02:00 Richard Guy Briggs <rgb@xxxxxxxxxx>: > > There were two formats of the audit MAC_STATUS record, one of which was more > > standard than the other. One listed enforcing status changes and the > > other listed enabled status changes with a non-standard label. In > > addition, the record was missing information about which LSM was > > responsible and the operation's completion status. While this record is > > only issued on success, the parser expects the res= field to be present. > > > > old enforcing/permissive: > > type=MAC_STATUS msg=audit(1523312831.378:24514): enforcing=0 old_enforcing=1 auid=0 ses=1 > > old enable/disable: > > type=MAC_STATUS msg=audit(1523312831.378:24514): selinux=0 auid=0 ses=1 > > > > List both sets of status and old values and add the lsm= field and the > > res= field. > > > > Here is the new format: > > type=MAC_STATUS msg=audit(1523293828.657:891): enforcing=0 old_enforcing=1 auid=0 ses=1 enabled=1 old-enabled=1 lsm=selinux res=1 > > > > This record already accompanied a SYSCALL record. > > > > See: https://github.com/linux-audit/audit-kernel/issues/46 > > Signed-off-by: Richard Guy Briggs <rgb@xxxxxxxxxx> > > --- > > security/selinux/selinuxfs.c | 11 +++++++---- > > 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) > > > > diff --git a/security/selinux/selinuxfs.c b/security/selinux/selinuxfs.c > > index 00eed84..00b21b2 100644 > > --- a/security/selinux/selinuxfs.c > > +++ b/security/selinux/selinuxfs.c > > @@ -145,10 +145,11 @@ static ssize_t sel_write_enforce(struct file *file, const char __user *buf, > > if (length) > > goto out; > > audit_log(current->audit_context, GFP_KERNEL, AUDIT_MAC_STATUS, > > - "enforcing=%d old_enforcing=%d auid=%u ses=%u", > > + "enforcing=%d old_enforcing=%d auid=%u ses=%u" > > + " enabled=%d old-enabled=%d lsm=selinux res=1", > > This is just a tiny nit but why does "old_enforcing" use an underscore > and "old-enabled" a dash? Shouldn't the style be consistent across > fields? Yes, but my understanding is a preference for underscore, and not to change existing field names. Steve? > Just my two cents... These details are worth noticing, thank you. > > new_value, selinux_enforcing, > > from_kuid(&init_user_ns, audit_get_loginuid(current)), > > - audit_get_sessionid(current)); > > + audit_get_sessionid(current), selinux_enabled, selinux_enabled); > > selinux_enforcing = new_value; > > if (selinux_enforcing) > > avc_ss_reset(0); > > @@ -272,9 +273,11 @@ static ssize_t sel_write_disable(struct file *file, const char __user *buf, > > if (length) > > goto out; > > audit_log(current->audit_context, GFP_KERNEL, AUDIT_MAC_STATUS, > > - "selinux=0 auid=%u ses=%u", > > + "enforcing=%d old_enforcing=%d auid=%u ses=%u" > > + " enabled=%d old-enabled=%d lsm=selinux res=1", > > + selinux_enforcing, selinux_enforcing, > > ^ also here > > > from_kuid(&init_user_ns, audit_get_loginuid(current)), > > - audit_get_sessionid(current)); > > + audit_get_sessionid(current), 0, 1); > > } > > > > length = count; > > Ondrej Mosnacek <omosnace at redhat dot com> - RGB -- Richard Guy Briggs <rgb@xxxxxxxxxx> Sr. S/W Engineer, Kernel Security, Base Operating Systems Remote, Ottawa, Red Hat Canada IRC: rgb, SunRaycer Voice: +1.647.777.2635, Internal: (81) 32635
