On Wed, Feb 28, 2018 at 2:15 AM, Vit Mojzis <vmojzis@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > access() uses real UID instead of effective UID which causes false > negative checks in setuid programs. Remove redundant access() checks > > Fixes: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1186431 > > Signed-off-by: Vit Mojzis <vmojzis@xxxxxxxxxx> > --- > libsemanage/src/direct_api.c | 7 ------- > libsemanage/src/semanage_store.c | 17 ++++++++--------- > 2 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/libsemanage/src/direct_api.c b/libsemanage/src/direct_api.c > index 88873c43..b7899d68 100644 > --- a/libsemanage/src/direct_api.c > +++ b/libsemanage/src/direct_api.c > @@ -148,9 +148,6 @@ int semanage_direct_connect(semanage_handle_t * sh) > if (semanage_create_store(sh, 1)) > goto err; > > - if (semanage_access_check(sh) < SEMANAGE_CAN_READ) > - goto err; > - > sh->u.direct.translock_file_fd = -1; > sh->u.direct.activelock_file_fd = -1; > > @@ -398,10 +395,6 @@ static int semanage_direct_disconnect(semanage_handle_t *sh) > > static int semanage_direct_begintrans(semanage_handle_t * sh) > { > - > - if (semanage_access_check(sh) != SEMANAGE_CAN_WRITE) { > - return -1; > - } > if (semanage_get_trans_lock(sh) < 0) { > return -1; > } > diff --git a/libsemanage/src/semanage_store.c b/libsemanage/src/semanage_store.c > index 936e6495..4bd1d651 100644 > --- a/libsemanage/src/semanage_store.c > +++ b/libsemanage/src/semanage_store.c > @@ -538,7 +538,6 @@ char *semanage_conf_path(void) > int semanage_create_store(semanage_handle_t * sh, int create) > { > struct stat sb; > - int mode_mask = R_OK | W_OK | X_OK; > const char *path = semanage_files[SEMANAGE_ROOT]; > int fd; > > @@ -557,9 +556,9 @@ int semanage_create_store(semanage_handle_t * sh, int create) > return -1; > } > } else { > - if (!S_ISDIR(sb.st_mode) || access(path, mode_mask) == -1) { > + if (!S_ISDIR(sb.st_mode)) { > ERR(sh, > - "Could not access module store at %s, or it is not a directory.", > + "Module store at %s is not a directory.", > path); > return -1; > } > @@ -580,9 +579,9 @@ int semanage_create_store(semanage_handle_t * sh, int create) > return -1; > } > } else { > - if (!S_ISDIR(sb.st_mode) || access(path, mode_mask) == -1) { > + if (!S_ISDIR(sb.st_mode)) { > ERR(sh, > - "Could not access module store active subdirectory at %s, or it is not a directory.", > + "Module store active subdirectory at %s is not a directory.", > path); > return -1; > } > @@ -603,9 +602,9 @@ int semanage_create_store(semanage_handle_t * sh, int create) > return -1; > } > } else { > - if (!S_ISDIR(sb.st_mode) || access(path, mode_mask) == -1) { > + if (!S_ISDIR(sb.st_mode)) { > ERR(sh, > - "Could not access module store active modules subdirectory at %s, or it is not a directory.", > + "Module store active modules subdirectory at %s is not a directory.", > path); > return -1; > } > @@ -624,8 +623,8 @@ int semanage_create_store(semanage_handle_t * sh, int create) > return -1; > } > } else { > - if (!S_ISREG(sb.st_mode) || access(path, R_OK | W_OK) == -1) { > - ERR(sh, "Could not access lock file at %s.", path); > + if (!S_ISREG(sb.st_mode)) { > + ERR(sh, "Object at %s is not a lock file.", path); > return -1; > } > } > -- > 2.14.3 > > Tenative ack on testing. This routine semanage_create_store() has some crazy indenting, a lot of that could be organized to be way-less horizontal.
