On Mon, 2017-04-10 at 21:11 +0200, Nicolas Iooss wrote:
> Signed-off-by: Nicolas Iooss <nicolas.iooss@xxxxxxx>
Thanks, all three applied.
> ---
> libsepol/src/module_to_cil.c | 10 +++++-----
> 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/libsepol/src/module_to_cil.c
> b/libsepol/src/module_to_cil.c
> index 45acdeb1a4e0..ac095c30f4f3 100644
> --- a/libsepol/src/module_to_cil.c
> +++ b/libsepol/src/module_to_cil.c
> @@ -791,8 +791,8 @@ static int cil_print_attr_strs(int indent, struct
> policydb *pdb, int is_type, vo
> // CIL doesn't support anonymous
> positive/negative/complemented sets. So
> // instead we create a CIL type/roleattributeset that
> matches the set. If
> // the set has a negative set, then convert it to is (P &
> !N), where P is
> - // the list of members in the positive set , and N is the
> list of members
> - // in the negative set. Additonally, if the set is
> complemented, then wrap
> + // the list of members in the positive set and N is the list
> of members
> + // in the negative set. Additionally, if the set is
> complemented, then wrap
> // the whole thing with a negation.
>
> struct ebitmap_node *node;
> @@ -2103,13 +2103,13 @@ static int role_to_cil(int indent, struct
> policydb *pdb, struct avrule_block *UN
> // the policy type, it would result in
> duplicate declarations,
> // which isn't allowed in CIL. Patches have
> been made to refpolicy
> // to remove these duplicate role
> declarations, but we need to be
> - // backwards compatable and support older
> policies. Since we know
> + // backwards compatible and support older
> policies. Since we know
> // these roles are always declared in base,
> only print them when we
> // see them in the base module. If the
> declarations appear in a
> // non-base module, ignore their
> declarations.
> //
> // Note that this is a hack, and if a policy
> author does not define
> - // one of these roles in base, the
> declaration will not appeaer in
> + // one of these roles in base, the
> declaration will not appear in
> // the resulting policy, likely resulting in
> a compilation error in
> // CIL.
> //
> @@ -2289,7 +2289,7 @@ static int user_to_cil(int indent, struct
> policydb *pdb, struct avrule_block *bl
>
> if (block->flags & AVRULE_OPTIONAL) {
> // sensitivites in user statements in optionals do
> not have the
> - // standard -1 offest
> + // standard -1 offset
> sens_offset = 0;
> }
>
_______________________________________________
Selinux mailing list
Selinux@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe, send email to Selinux-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxx.
To get help, send an email containing "help" to Selinux-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx.
