On Tue, Sep 20, 2016 at 07:43:34PM -0400, Paul Moore wrote: > So far the discussion has been around providing access controls at the > transport layer, are there any RDMA entities that are transport > agnostic that might be better suited for what we are trying to do? Or > is it simply that the RDMA layer is tied so tightly to the underlying > transport that we can't separate the two and have to consider them as > one? The generic RDMA layer is called 'rdmacm' and it is the layer Mellanox's already applied patches for RDMA namespace enablement worked at. Jason _______________________________________________ Selinux mailing list Selinux@xxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe, send email to Selinux-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxx. To get help, send an email containing "help" to Selinux-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx.
