Re: [RFC][PATCH 1/2 v2] proc: Relax /proc/<tid>/timerslack_ns capability requirements

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, Jul 15, 2016 at 1:03 PM, John Stultz <john.stultz@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 15, 2016 at 12:55 PM, Nick Kralevich <nnk@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> This should also have a similar LSM check for reads. For the SELinux
>> implementation, this can map to the PROCESS__GETSCHED permission.
>
> Ok. I'll wire that in as well.
>
> Would adding both selinux_task_get and set methods in the same patch
> be ok? Or would folks prefer they be split into two?

I would prefer 1 patch.


-- 
Nick Kralevich | Android Security | nnk@xxxxxxxxxx | 650.214.4037
_______________________________________________
Selinux mailing list
Selinux@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe, send email to Selinux-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxx.
To get help, send an email containing "help" to Selinux-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx.



[Index of Archives]     [Selinux Refpolicy]     [Linux SGX]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Yosemite Photos]     [Yosemite Camping]     [Yosemite Campsites]     [KDE Users]     [Gnome Users]

  Powered by Linux