Hi Stephen, If I install my own ref policy RPM on the Centos7 box, would that replace the existing or stock ref policy? David On Tue, Dec 8, 2015 at 10:48 AM, Higgs, Stephen <Stephen.Higgs@xxxxxxxx> wrote: >> -----Original Message----- >> From: Selinux [mailto:selinux-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of David >> Li >> Sent: Tuesday, December 08, 2015 1:29 PM >> To: selinux@xxxxxxxxxxxxx >> Subject: A newbie's question >> >> Hi, >> >> I thought I would post this question here in addition to the Fedora list >> to get more help. >> >> ---- >> >> Maybe this is just for my own clarifications; I am about to start >> SELinux learning and development. I have a stock Cento 7.1 install and >> I am curious what''s difference between the following two: >> >> 1. Enable SElinux and setenforce 1 on the stock install >> >> vs. >> >> 2. Build a reference policy RPM and install it on the box. Then do step >> 1 as above. >> >> Are there any differences in terms of ref policy? Would step 1 also have >> the ref policy enabled by default too? >> >> Thanks. >> _______________________________________________ >> Selinux mailing list >> Selinux@xxxxxxxxxxxxx >> To unsubscribe, send email to Selinux-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxx. >> To get help, send an email containing "help" to Selinux- >> request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx. > > CentOS 7.1 has the reference policy installed, but there could be a difference in version of the RPM reference policy and the version that is current for 7.1. > > The seinfo command is one way to show what is currently installed. > > --Stephen > _______________________________________________ Selinux mailing list Selinux@xxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe, send email to Selinux-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxx. To get help, send an email containing "help" to Selinux-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx.
