Re: secilc: segfault on what should be "Recursive block call found"?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA512

On Sat, Sep 12, 2015 at 02:53:21PM +0200, Dominick Grift wrote:
<snip>
> 
> secilc helpfully threw a message telling me:
> 
>     Recursive macro call found
>     Failed to compile cildb: -1
> 

The above is an example for how error message should *not* look. Here is
an example of how they *should* look:

macro statement is not allowed in optionals (/run/user/1000/dssp/sources/modules/contrib/system/usersubj/macros.cil:819)

- -- 
02DFF788
4D30 903A 1CF3 B756 FB48  1514 3148 83A2 02DF F788
https://sks-keyservers.net/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0x314883A202DFF788
Dominick Grift
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2
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=4D0w
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
_______________________________________________
Selinux mailing list
Selinux@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe, send email to Selinux-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxx.
To get help, send an email containing "help" to Selinux-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx.



[Index of Archives]     [Selinux Refpolicy]     [Linux SGX]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Yosemite Photos]     [Yosemite Camping]     [Yosemite Campsites]     [KDE Users]     [Gnome Users]

  Powered by Linux