On Thu, Sep 03, 2015 at 08:18:17AM -0400, James Carter wrote: > On 09/03/2015 05:48 AM, Dominick Grift wrote: > >Anyone tried "secilc test/in_test.cil" lately? It dumps core here. > > > >$ secilc test/in_test.cil > >Segmentation fault (core dumped) > > > > > > It works for me for the current master branch of SELinux userspace installed > locally. What version are you using? > > Jim > Ok so that turns out to be a bug in Fedora. However. I can still get secilc to segfault on "in". I wonder if the following is or should be supported: The scenario is: I want to simplify my macros by using blockabstracts/inherits to provide a single point of failure As a matter of test i made these two changes: https://github.com/DefenSec/dssp/commit/85ba6f1848118e16b5544052dc5764663b272262 https://github.com/DefenSec/dssp-contrib/commit/77442e1e4658df99d1ce74732338a9c4ad80a6a3 However this makes secilc segfault, and i do not see why. I first thought it was because i was using "ARG1" in the blockabstract (see first commit). However that seems to not be the case. I am left wondering: what am i doing wrong here (obviously secilc should not segfault nevertheless) -- 02DFF788 4D30 903A 1CF3 B756 FB48 1514 3148 83A2 02DF F788 http://keys.gnupg.net/pks/lookup?op=vindex&search=0x314883A202DFF788 Dominick Grift
Attachment:
pgpuDK91nanag.pgp
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ Selinux mailing list Selinux@xxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe, send email to Selinux-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxx. To get help, send an email containing "help" to Selinux-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx.
