On Wednesday, August 12, 2015 05:38:14 PM Steve Grubb wrote: > On Wednesday, August 12, 2015 08:40:34 AM Paul Moore wrote: > > Hello all, > > > > I'm currently working on a set of LSM hooks for the new kdbus IPC > > mechanism > > and one of the things that I believe we will need to add is a new audit > > field for the kdbus service name (very similar to the old fashioned dbus > > service name). I was thinking "kdbus_svc" for the field name, any > > objections? > > What was used on the old dbus events? The very generic "service" field name, see the "acquire_svc" example in the URL below. I believe there is some value in picking a new field name since 1) the field name is too generic in my opinion and 2) kdbus != dbus. * http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/dbus/2004-November/001728.html -- paul moore security @ redhat _______________________________________________ Selinux mailing list Selinux@xxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe, send email to Selinux-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxx. To get help, send an email containing "help" to Selinux-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx.
