Re: Strange behavior: type boundaries

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, Jun 22, 2015 at 06:07:20PM +0200, Miroslav Grepl wrote:

> 
> In Fedora, we have unconfined_service_t domain for unconfined services
> started by init. So there is init_t @bin_t -> unconfined_service_t and
> we get op=security_bounded_transition for init_t against
> unconfined_service_t. But of course it is not going to work with
> 
> typebounds init_t unconfined_service_t;
> 
> because there is
> 
> # <audit-1401> op=security_compute_av reason=bounds
> scontext=system_u:system_r:unconfined_service_t:s0
> tcontext=system_u:object_r:bin_t:s0 tclass=file perms=entrypoint
> 
> So this logic breaks our concept with unconfined_service_t.
> 

What is running in the unconfined_service_t domain in that event?

> -- 
> Miroslav Grepl
> Senior Software Engineer, SELinux Solutions
> Red Hat, Inc.
> _______________________________________________
> Selinux mailing list
> Selinux@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> To unsubscribe, send email to Selinux-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxx.
> To get help, send an email containing "help" to Selinux-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx.

-- 
02DFF788
4D30 903A 1CF3 B756 FB48  1514 3148 83A2 02DF F788
http://keys.gnupg.net/pks/lookup?op=vindex&search=0x314883A202DFF788
Dominick Grift

Attachment: pgpCrZiu8tzvc.pgp
Description: PGP signature

_______________________________________________
Selinux mailing list
Selinux@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe, send email to Selinux-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxx.
To get help, send an email containing "help" to Selinux-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx.

[Index of Archives]     [Selinux Refpolicy]     [Linux SGX]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Yosemite Photos]     [Yosemite Camping]     [Yosemite Campsites]     [KDE Users]     [Gnome Users]

  Powered by Linux