Re: SELinux: Interface Labeling Problem

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, Jun 11, 2015 at 10:47 PM, Maurizio Pagani
<pag.maurizio@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> ok, imattached also the community on this thread.
>> >> -----Messaggio originale-----
>> >> Da: Stephen Smalley [mailto:sds@xxxxxxxxxxxxx]
[...]
>> >> In any event, SELinux network permission checks have changed over time.
>> >> The netif { tcp_recv tcp_send udp_recv udp_send } checks were legacy
>> >> network checks that were removed in Linux 2.6.30.  netif { ingress
>> >> egress }
>> >> are newer checks that are only enabled if you have configured peer
>> >> labeling
>> >> via NetLabel or labeled IPSEC/xfrm.

As Stephen already mentioned, recent Linux kernels only listen to the
egress/ingress permissions in the netif class. The other permissions
might still be marked as "existing" for backwards compatibility, but
they are not enforced anymore. See
http://lists.openwall.net/netdev/2009/03/27/144

To enable the egress/ingress support however, you need to use either
Labeled IPSec or NetLabel/CIPSO support.

If you want to use SECMARK, then the controls are not on the netif
class, but on the packet classes.

Wkr,
  Sven Vermeulen
_______________________________________________
Selinux mailing list
Selinux@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe, send email to Selinux-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxx.
To get help, send an email containing "help" to Selinux-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx.




[Index of Archives]     [Selinux Refpolicy]     [Linux SGX]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Yosemite Photos]     [Yosemite Camping]     [Yosemite Campsites]     [KDE Users]     [Gnome Users]

  Powered by Linux