On Thu, May 21, 2015 at 11:14 AM, Jeffrey Vander Stoep <jeffv@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > I selected operation because it is not ioctl specific. Stephen and I > had discussed the possibility of this being used for other things but > ultimately decided to focus on ioctls because that was my intended > use-case. I would be ok with other names, but I also thing the naming > could be kept the same and I could add clearer in-code comments to > better convey the extended operations or extended permissions idea. <grumble> <grumble> <grumble> Okay, it's been a day and I can't think of anything else beyond what we've discussed so just stick with operation for now and add some better comments. It's all internal anyway so renaming in the future is a non-issue (minus the usual code churn arguments). -- paul moore www.paul-moore.com _______________________________________________ Selinux mailing list Selinux@xxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe, send email to Selinux-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxx. To get help, send an email containing "help" to Selinux-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx.
