On Tuesday, January 13, 2015 10:23:23 PM Mimi Zohar wrote: > I would assume only 'security.evm' is not portable as it attempts to > tightly bind the file metadata to the file data. Casey? Paul? [NOTE: Added the SELinux mailing list to the CC line.] The SELinux xattr should be portable assuming the security label's semantics remain constant across the different security policies. If the label is completely unknown SELinux should handle it correctly, it will be treated as unlabeled until a module is loaded which defines the label. Although, this is just for initramfs, yes? If so, I'm not sure this matters that much from a practical point of view; Stephen or someone else from the SELinux list may have some thoughts on this. -- paul moore security @ redhat _______________________________________________ Selinux mailing list Selinux@xxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe, send email to Selinux-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxx. To get help, send an email containing "help" to Selinux-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx.
