Re: RFC: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1174405

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Ports in the local port range can be auto-assigned by the kernel to
unbound sockets on first use.  So it makes no sense to control them,
and there isn't even an LSM hook in the place where such auto-port
selection occurs.  Controlling binding to ports is only useful when
the port number is a "name" (i.e. a well-defined value that is
expected to correspond to a specific service), to prevent spoofing of
security-relevant services like sshd.

On Fri, Jan 9, 2015 at 4:05 PM, Dominick Grift <dac.override@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1174405
>
> This is a inconsistency in SELinux
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Selinux mailing list
> Selinux@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> To unsubscribe, send email to Selinux-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxx.
> To get help, send an email containing "help" to Selinux-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx.
_______________________________________________
Selinux mailing list
Selinux@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe, send email to Selinux-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxx.
To get help, send an email containing "help" to Selinux-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx.



[Index of Archives]     [Selinux Refpolicy]     [Linux SGX]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Yosemite Photos]     [Yosemite Camping]     [Yosemite Campsites]     [KDE Users]     [Gnome Users]

  Powered by Linux