Re: [PATCH] selinux: Support SCTP protocol

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Yes I thought there might be more to this as the orginal to-do list referred to a
bug report that pointed to the possible updates required. I then saw the new list
that said "Proper support for SCTP". I was not sure what it meant until now.

Anyway I may carry on and see how far I get. However what about the 
"Improve support for the different network address families with 
more socket classes" that is on the list. Would the type of patch I submitted
be suitable for that type of basic support for say Bluetooth or are you really looking
for the detailed support as in SCTP.

Richard


----- Original Message -----

> From: Paul Moore <paul@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> To: Richard Haines <richard_c_haines@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: selinux@xxxxxxxxxxxxx; vyasevic@xxxxxxxxxx; dborkman@xxxxxxxxxx
> Sent: Friday, 7 November 2014, 16:35
> Subject: Re: [PATCH] selinux: Support SCTP protocol
> 
> On Friday, November 07, 2014 01:52:09 PM Richard Haines wrote:
>>  This is an RFC patch.
> 
> Thanks for your patch, I appreciate the time and effort that went into 
> developing it.
> 
> Unfortunately, I think this patch may be a bit too simplistic.  I haven't 
> looked too closely at the SCTP code in recent times, but from my earlier look, 
> SCTP associations stuck out as something that will need special handling and I 
> don't see that in this initial patch.  From what I could see, SCTP 
> associations seem close-ish to TCP connections and we may be able to handle 
> them in a similar manner, but I can't say for certain.  Someone would need 
> to 
> investigate this further.
> 
> There is also an issue of multi-homing which might, or might not, present an 
> issue for peer labeling, but once again I can't say for certain.
> 
> I'm also not entirely sure if we need any special handling for the SCTP 
> handshake (see TCP's connection request sockets).  Hopefully not, but 
> something to be aware of if you keep working on this.
> 
> I *really* don't want to scare you off of working on SCTP support, I just 
> want 
> to caution you that it likely isn't as easy as adding basic support for a 
> new 
> object class.
> 
> -- 
> paul moore
> www.paul-moore.com
> 

_______________________________________________
Selinux mailing list
Selinux@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe, send email to Selinux-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxx.
To get help, send an email containing "help" to Selinux-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx.





[Index of Archives]     [Selinux Refpolicy]     [Linux SGX]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Yosemite Photos]     [Yosemite Camping]     [Yosemite Campsites]     [KDE Users]     [Gnome Users]

  Powered by Linux