I started rewriting my policy using name spaces again. I was assuming the the name space issues were fixed. However I am encountering, what i believe, is an inconsistency. The block statement is used to declare a name space in module a i declare the a (root) name space (block a ... ) in module b i declare the b name space in the existing a (root) name space (in a (block b ... ) ) All is well so far... However if i now want to declare the c name space in the existing a.b name space then cilc is unable to resolve the a.b name space (in a.b (block c ... ) ) "Unable to resolve a.b in in statement..." The a.b name space exists The workaround to this inconsistency is to create duplicate declarations: (in a (block b (block c ... ) ) ) Now the b name space is declared two times, but it works around the issue Why can it not resolve the existing a.b name space? -- Dominick Grift
Attachment:
pgpuAT2FcsYk1.pgp
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ Selinux mailing list Selinux@xxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe, send email to Selinux-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxx. To get help, send an email containing "help" to Selinux-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx.