On Thursday, September 18, 2014 08:50:17 PM Richard Guy Briggs wrote:
> Convert audit_log() call to WARN_ONCE().
>
> Rename "type=" to nlmsg_type=" to avoid confusion with the audit record
> type.
>
> Added "protocol=" to help track down which protocol (NETLINK_AUDIT?) was
> used within the netlink protocol family.
>
> Signed-off-by: Richard Guy Briggs <rgb@xxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> security/selinux/hooks.c | 7 +++----
> 1 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
I rewrote the patch subject line as it doesn't really make much sense given
the changes made by the patch, but other than that it looks fine to me.
Applied.
> diff --git a/security/selinux/hooks.c b/security/selinux/hooks.c
> index 83d06db..28ec61c 100644
> --- a/security/selinux/hooks.c
> +++ b/security/selinux/hooks.c
> @@ -4681,10 +4681,9 @@ static int selinux_nlmsg_perm(struct sock *sk, struct
> sk_buff *skb) err = selinux_nlmsg_lookup(sksec->sclass, nlh->nlmsg_type,
> &perm); if (err) {
> if (err == -EINVAL) {
> - audit_log(current->audit_context, GFP_KERNEL,
AUDIT_SELINUX_ERR,
> - "SELinux: unrecognized netlink message"
> - " type=%hu for sclass=%hu\n",
> - nlh->nlmsg_type, sksec->sclass);
> + WARN_ONCE(1, "selinux_nlmsg_perm: unrecognized netlink
message:"
> + " protocol=%hu nlmsg_type=%hu sclass=%hu\n",
> + sk->sk_protocol, nlh->nlmsg_type, sksec->sclass);
> if (!selinux_enforcing || security_get_allow_unknown())
> err = 0;
> }
--
paul moore
security and virtualization @ redhat
_______________________________________________
Selinux mailing list
Selinux@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe, send email to Selinux-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxx.
To get help, send an email containing "help" to Selinux-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx.
