On Mon, 2014-07-14 at 10:50 -0400, Christopher J. PeBenito wrote: < snip > > > > > Yes, but i prefer minimal/small (and preferably no interpreters): > > > > # file /usr/bin/seinfo > > /usr/bin/seinfo: ELF 64-bit LSB executable, x86-64, version 1 (SYSV), > > dynamically linked (uses shared libs), for GNU/Linux 2.6.32, > > BuildID[sha1]=04ae4e364753b502f227216e548e1ccbf0f33e14, stripped > > > > # file /usr/bin/sepolicy > > /usr/bin/sepolicy: Python script, ASCII text executable, with very long > > lines > > sepolicy is using libapol from setools, so its not really different than > seinfo, other than using a Python frontend. Since SETools 4 is Python, > you'll eventually be running low on choices if you're trying to stick to > only C tools :) > Ah, my bait works :D Yes i know, and i am not really happy with those developments, but then again it is just a preference. In case i really need minimal i can hopefully stick to setools3. It has all the functionality i require. _______________________________________________ Selinux mailing list Selinux@xxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe, send email to Selinux-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxx. To get help, send an email containing "help" to Selinux-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx.
