On Thu, 2014-07-10 at 14:52 +0200, Dominick Grift wrote: > On Thu, 2014-07-10 at 08:35 -0400, Stephen Smalley wrote: > > <snip> > > > Thanks for testing it. How did it look from a performance POV, wrt > > memory use and runtime? > > > > I have not (yet) really focused on that but i suppose there was no real > noticeable slow down or speed up. > > Any tips on how i could provide useful benchmarks? > > I suppose i could enable the neverallow check > in /etc/selinux/semanage.conf and i would bet it is now much faster than > it used to be (in fact ill try that) > > I suspect i was lying. I am installing a guest with similar specs now and same software except the cil mods and then do some comparison. i suppose stuff like time semodule -B and looking at top I did do a semodule -B with checking for neverallow rules but that found a violation really fast (thanks fedora). So although i cant really say how much faster that is , it is pretty safe to assume its much faster now _______________________________________________ Selinux mailing list Selinux@xxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe, send email to Selinux-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxx. To get help, send an email containing "help" to Selinux-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx.
