Re: [PATCH] selinux: Permit transitions under NO_NEW_PRIVS or NOSUID under certain, circumstances.

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, Jun 12, 2014 at 12:18 PM, Stephen Smalley <sds@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>

One more minor nit:

"If the caller SID is bounded by the callee SID"

Is that backwards?  I think the code is correct, but I'm less
convinced by the changelog.


-- 
Andy Lutomirski
AMA Capital Management, LLC
_______________________________________________
Selinux mailing list
Selinux@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe, send email to Selinux-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxx.
To get help, send an email containing "help" to Selinux-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx.




[Index of Archives]     [Selinux Refpolicy]     [Linux SGX]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Yosemite Photos]     [Yosemite Camping]     [Yosemite Campsites]     [KDE Users]     [Gnome Users]

  Powered by Linux